Available 24/7 via chat
Available 24/7 via chat
A true independent watchmaker in 2025 is still defined by the same three pillars that the AHCI laid down in 1985: creative control, financial autonomy, and personal execution of the majority of the work. That means the person whose name is on the dial must personally design the watch, finish most of the critical components (bridges, plates, often the dial and hands), and produce fewer than roughly 500 watches per year without answering to LVMH, Richemont, Swatch Group, Citizen, or private-equity overlords. Anything else is marketing.
Rolex and Omega are magnificent tool-watch factories. They produce 1.2 million and 700,000 watches per year respectively, with incredible bracelets, lume, sapphire crystals, and ceramic bezels. But they are corporations with shareholders. An independent watchmaker might spend eight hours black-polishing a single pair of chronograph pushers. Rolex and Omega finish thousands of pushers per day with CNC and robotic polishing. Both approaches are valid — they are simply not the same thing.
A truly independent watchmaker usually develops their own calibre from the main plate up, or at the very least heavily modifies an ébauche and finishes it to a level that makes a standard movements look embarrassed. Rexhep Rexhepi, Simon Brette, and Petermann Bédat all make their own balance springs in 2025 — something even Patek Philippe outsources to a sister company.
Because they have to. When you make 38 watches a year with hand-made parts that are not interchangeable, you cannot send them to the Swatch Group service center in Secaucus. Roger W. Smith, Philippe Dufour, and Rexhep Rexhepi all service every single watch that leaves their atelier for the lifetime of the piece — often the watchmaker himself.
Top offenders in 2025:
Omega leans hard into NASA heritage and the Seamaster dive-watch legend. Seiko and Grand Seiko push Spring Drive, Zaratsu polishing, and Japanese craftsmanship. Both are completely transparent that they are large, vertically integrated corporations. They never pretend to be a lone watchmaker in a barn — which is why the watch community respects them more than the corporate “indies.”
Conglomerates have marketing budgets measured in tens of millions, global distribution, and economies of scale. Independent watchmakers have a waiting list, a personal Instagram, and usually one guy who answers emails at 2 a.m. One can give you a steel sports watch tomorrow. The other can give you a one-of-one chronograph with hand-guilloché dial in 2029 — if you’re lucky.
The watch community on Reddit, Instagram, and private Discord servers is ruthless in 2025. Brands like Norqain and post-2024 Moser get roasted daily. Hodinkee still covers them because ad dollars, but the comment sections are bloodbaths. True independents like Simon Brette and Petermann Bédat dominate “best of” lists with zero marketing spend.
Look for:
True independents often have dials that are engine-turned by hand (Joshua Shapiro), enamelled in-house (Kari Voutilainen legacy), or made of exotic materials no factory would touch. Bezels are usually machined in tiny batches — you won’t see perfect hairline brushing across 5,000 units. Sapphire crystals are often domed and double- or triple-AR coated by specialists the watchmaker knows personally.
Real independent watchmakers rarely make integrated-bracelet sports watches because bracelets are industrial nightmares. When they do (Grönefeld 1941 Gronograaf), every link is hand-finished.
They aren’t. Grand Seiko is 100 % owned by Seiko Epson Corporation. Hamilton is Swatch Group. Both are superb, honest brands that never claim to be independent watchmakers. That transparency is why collectors love them.
Rarity and soul. A Grand Seiko Snowflake is beautiful and will lose 30 % the moment you walk out of the boutique. A Simon Brette Chronomètre Artisans (38 pieces total) is already flipping for 4–5× retail in private sales.
They embarrass the big brands. When a 29-year-old in Lyon makes his own balance springs and a cleaner dial than anything coming out of Bienne, it forces Rolex and Omega to up their game. The co-axial escapement, ceramic bezels, and METAS certification all happened because independents kept raising the bar.
| Category | True Independent | Rolex / Omega / GS |
|---|---|---|
| Annual production | 20–300 | 100,000–1.2 million |
| Hand-finishing | Extensive | Minimal to none |
| Rarity | Genuine | Marketing “limited” |
| 10-year expected return | +300–2,000 % (Dufour, Journe) | –20 % to +100 % |
| Service experience | Personal, by the maker | Anonymous service center |
You get a direct relationship with the person who built your watch, parts availability for life, and the knowledge that your money went to a someone who loves the craft instead of a shareholder in Paris or Tokyo.
The undisputed kings and rising stars:
Simon Brette makes his own balance springs. Petermann Bédat invented a new dead-beat seconds. Rexhep Rexhepi’s Chronomètre Contemporain II has finishing that rivals 1990s Patek. These are not modified Sellita movements — these are new calibres designed and executed by one or two people.
True independent dive watches are almost non-existent because cases and bracelets are industrial. The rare exceptions:
Germany has a proud pocket of real independents: Lang & Heyne, Moritz Grossmann (still small and founder-influenced), and Roland Schwertner’s Nomos (which grew too big to be truly independent but remains German-owned and remarkably honest).
True independents rarely chase Super-LumiNova plots or traveller GMTs because those are solved problems. When they do lume (Sarpaneva), it’s often hand-applied old radium style. Second hands are usually blued by hand over an alcohol flame, not mass-produced.
Independents excel at dress watches and complicated chronographs because that’s where hand-finishing and originality shine. Tool watches and quartz watches are almost non-existent among real independents — those are factory domains.
Look where they exhibit. True independents are in the Carré des Horlogers or simply don’t attend. Corporate “indies” pay for massive booths next to Cartier and Rolex.
Three futures:
Reddit, Instagram, and Discord have democratised knowledge. A brand can no longer hide behind PR — the community fact-checks ownership, production numbers, and bench photos in real time.
Steel sports watches will remain the domain of Rolex, Tudor, Omega, and Grand Seiko. Quartz is almost extinct among serious independents — the only notable exception is Torsti Laine with his quartz-regulated mechanical prototypes.
Because the beating heart of watch enthusiasm in 2025 is no longer “will it hold value?” but “does it have soul?” A scratched Simon Brette or Rexhep Rexhepi tells a better story than a pristine Rolex bought on the grey market.
It’s important to draw a clear line between pure haute horlogerie independents and the new wave of honest, founder-led microbrands like Studio Underd0g, Ming, Furlan Marri, or anOrdain. We love both camps deeply, but they are fundamentally different. The first group (Dufour, Rexhep Rexhepi, Simon Brette, Petermann Bédat, etc.) operates at the absolute pinnacle of traditional watchmaking: hand-made escapements, in-house balance springs, black-polished steel taken to mirror perfection, and production measured in dozens, not thousands. Buying one is closer to commissioning a painting from a living master than purchasing a watch.
The second group is creatively independent, founder-owned, transparent, and delivers astonishing design and value at €500–€6,000, but they openly rely on third-party cases, dials, and modified ebauches because making everything in a garage is simply impossible at that price. Both are a thousand times more soulful than most corporate “independents,” yet one is playing in the stratosphere of haute horlogerie while the other is democratising great design. Respect and wrist time for all of them — just don’t confuse a Studio Underd0g watermelon with a Petermann Bédat dead-beat seconds; they’re both delicious, but they’re not the same fruit.
At the end of the day, this is all about the pure love of watches. Speaking personally, I’ve come to believe that most corporate conglomerates are ultimately driven by profit margins and shareholder value rather than by a genuine desire to serve people who live and breathe horology. That’s exactly why our shop only carries independents, and it’s why I’m convinced a quiet revolution is already underway. A new generation of collectors, raised on Reddit, Instagram, and total transparency, is waking up to the difference between marketing and soul. I truly believe the next ten years will belong to the independents, because young collectors don’t just want a luxury watch; they want a story, a relationship, and the knowledge that their purchase directly supported someone who loves this craft as much as they do.